This is an unprofessional Collection cite. That wishes for Speech and Debate with Regards to the topics collected and Special Libraried. I wish for defense of Fair Use Doctrine, not for profit, educational collection.

"The new order was tailored to a genius who proposed to constrain the contending forces, both domestic and foreign, by manipulating their antagonisms" "As a professor, I tended to think of history as run by impersonal forces. But when you see it in practice, you see the difference personalities make." Therefore, "Whenever peace-concieved as the avoidance of war-has been the primary objective of a power or a group of powers, the international system has been at the mercy of the most ruthless member" Henry Kissinger

The World market crashed. There was complete blame from the worlds most ruthless power on the world's most protective and meditational power. So I responded with: "We must now face the harsh truth that the objectives of communism [The Communist Chinese Party's (CCP) Economic Espionage Units called the MSS] are being steadily advanced because many of us do not recognize the means used to advance them. ... The individual is handicapped by coming face to face with a Conspiracy so monstrous she or he cannot believe it exists. The American mind simply has not come to a realization of the evil which has been introduced into our midst" Therefore, like Dr. John Nash would probable think: This is because of our lost state craft of tracing scientific coding in the intelligence community of the algorithmic code of the Communist espionage agents. As "The Communist [CCP's economic espionage units called the MSS] threat from without must not blind us to the Communist [CCP's economic espionage units called the MSS] threat from within. The latter is reaching into the very heart of America through its espionage agents and a cunning, defiant, and lawless communist party, which is fanatically dedicated to the Marxist cause of world enslavement and destruction of the foundations of our Democracy/Republic." J. Edgar Hoover. Which allows the Communist to shape the future and powers that be. As "Our citizens and our future citizens cannot share properly in shaping the future unless we understand the present, for the raw material of events to come is the knowledge of the present and what we make it"

Lieutenant General Leslie R. Groves

If you have any problem with IP or copyright laws that you feel are in violation of the research clause that allows me to cite them as per clicking on them. Then please email me at
US Copy Right Office Fair Use doctrine. Special Libary community common law, and Speech and Debate Congressional research civilian assistant. All legal defenses to copy right infringement.

Saturday, June 18, 2011

The problem arises when people oppress things.

The civility of person is based on the basics of how they react to certain instances. This then means that a person is able to not provoke actions of hostility. However, on the idea of civil rights issues, one would should not be seen on the provocation. However, on what why one is provoking. For example, my personal defamation on Vice President Biden. The term I used means, means shows no courage. That is the basics for the term. Along with that the term I use in which I place in front of the word commy is a word that Ali Wei used to the Communists as he expressed his provocation for the oppression of people's writes to write peacefully like the book writers and the Falun Gong. At that point one steps into a different sort of scrutiny. In which one is then not provoking to hurt yet to show shame and implement a thought process of reality, to what one has done.

For example, my uncivil actions towards Vice President Biden. My ancestors have tried to take care of tortoise for a long time, the metaphor is solid, a man who will not protect a tortoise is seen as weak the man who protects the tortoise is seen as strong. As such, the provocation of my uncivil name calling is not necessarily to provoke hostility as it is to provoke shame. I have been very indecent and would more than understand attacks on personal professional being. However, then I would argue the forefather anonymous claim in which our forefathers used pseudonymous to make fun of the king in very uncivil manners as per political dissent to the ones that acted as such. It is tried true and tested well that those who are willing to try the test of civility for civil rights issues as showing that the elite are not above the poor and a simple uncivil action shall not call upon them the duty to hurt, as the poor are basically shaming in such names.

I wish I could say that I am the utmost civil person. Then I would have to tell you I would not be a civil rights fighter. As the term fight preempts the idea of somewhat of an uncivil nature. If civility means polite.

Rider I
Again, if you find something you do not like a simple post and I will remove. If not I will remove it before I am placed in front of persecution. Unless of course they wish to fight me, then I as a civil rigths fighter I will invoke the ancient form of protection of incivility via anonymous names as per our forefathers would found it necessary to dissent to the elite in such a manner.

I do feel bad, for such things. However, the Communist Party deserves to be seeded crudely in shame, and Biden did attack a very peacefully creature to take its protection. Then again, if one would allow dissent then one could say that incivility is necessary. Along with the fact that if one did find a way to provide instead of take one would then could provoke a defense.

As for my special friends, the things I say are in secret if not then so not is secret as the paradigm is. 

No comments:

Post a Comment