Communist Characteristics from the Soviet Empire.

Creation of Inclusive Trade Group to outcast Free Market and Democracy Competitors

The Soviet Empire was based on the idea that they first had to find the biggest and baddest economies in which to tame and get on their side so as to create a very powerful trade force. They then did things like make the trade group believe that they should gain favor from the world as a consortium of countries that should gain favor with major Free Markets so as to get lending to help their contracts with smaller satellite countries. They then made contracts with the smaller countries as for a way to control their economy. In which was a way to stop other countries from being able to have fair trade with them. This was done purely on the idea that the Soviet Union would shift their internal economics from one side to the other so as to use their SOE's and Sovering wealth funds to make it cheaper to trade with them than a free countries free enterprises or market. As such, this then kept free markets out of these sponsored satellite countries. Thefore, allowing for a more inclusive reach of the Soviet union. This then eventually allowed the Soviets to drain the smaller countries of their economy and ability to pay so as to create them into a debt consortium. In which the Soviets where able to get them to believe that the idea of a one world single party rule via the Communist Party was the proper thing to do. 

Implementation of the a Single World Currency using that Trade Group

After which they where able to make the satellites and the bigger trade group partners believe that the idea of a single world currency was better than a multiplicity of countries using their own currency in line with their civility and social security matters. This then allowed the Soviets to further control the satellites and trade group. This was done by again shifting sources of power via resources. Which mean the Soviets had to literally go on resource domination campaigns to keep their SOE's and Sovereign Wealth funds full, so they could control the very expanding cold war domination. 

Resource domination for Centralized world Economic Control

The idea of the Soviets was that they would be able to control the world and implement them as the worlds rulers, so as to force Marxist idea of a non competitive enslavement to the leaders in a two class system. Which was those who worked and those who controlled the work. Therefore, the main stay of the policy was the Soviets ability to control all resource mines in everything they could get their hands around. 

How Economic Warfare is just Cold War all over again. 

This then was called the Cold War. The idea of Economic Warfare using Karl's Marxist theories of SOE's and Sovereign Wealth funds to centralize the wealth in the hands of the elitist leaders in which the workers would benefit from their control of the wealth. The word cold war was used. As many Free Markets and Democracies literally had their blood boil at the thought of centuries of fighting against Monarchist feudalism of a two class system to be reimplementing into the world. Along with this some of the major countries that the Soviets took over saw it as it truly was. Just a way to give power to a centralized country instead of allowing the wealth to be spread out via multiplicity. This then is in lock and step 

Communist Chinese Lock and Step with Soviet Characteristics

The Communist Chinese have stated for over 30 years that they would turn their country into a Free Market and a Democracy. This then along with the constant stabbing in the back as the Communist Chinese did not like the idea of the Soviets owning the worlds wealth of resources as they wanted to centralize the world around them, lead a softer hand towards the Communist Chinese. Yet, today we see the Communist Chinese have denounced any further political transformation into a Democracy with political adversary system that would create a proper check and balance to help spread their wealth out and slow their Cold War resource domination, as such. Along with that the Communist never really disbanded their SOE's or Sovereign Wealth funds. They just conglomerated them and extroverted them as a source of way to use as a cold war weapon to implement Communist Chinese foreign policy ideas and further resource conquest.

Furthermore, the Communist Chinese have regrouped the idea of a trade union to create sympathy for their people to cloak the cold war weapons. This then allowed them to hide in a group instead of properly being seen as they are. Along with this it gives them stronger allies to allow them to keep dominating the world in resources While the group thinks they are getting a great deal in cheap products. But really are being stunted form a health growth as resources are needed for real developing countries to grow. This then has allowed the Communist Chinese to create a firewall between them and those who seem them for what they are. As if they are attacked and properly placed on roll of cold war tactics their allies in their special trade group will attack back. As such, in more or less the Communist Chinese are using these other countries to allow them to become more powerful.



Along these cold war lines have been drawn. We see countries unwilling to trade with or even give the US as good a deal as they are willing to give the Communist Chinese. Venezuela one of the US's

Therefore, I can't see why educated scholar are saying that the free markets and Democracies have failed. When if a historical application of a prior massive SOE and Sovereign Wealth fund resource world domination country, did the exact same thing to the free markets and it was proven then that it was their fault.  While now that they have been destroyed by not taken care of their rural people via not allowing the natural free market spread of wealth. They admit it fully. Yet, we sit here and watch the Communist Chinese do the same exact thing under cloak of partial transitioned economy and politics and say it is the free markets and Democracies fault. When we all know darn well When the rich get greedy and centralized the people's wealth it is not the people who are at fault for the economic disparities but the greedy hordes. Which in international macro terms would be the worlds Communist Party of China. As they use the horded money to make the party richer and the worlds real developing countries poorer, literally via debt.

Rider I


Peace de la Resistance.