The proper calculations are not adequate. The basic idea is that the Communist lose no wealth nor really spend value at all on their military build up as their Communist Cold War weapons on all of their resources and basic manufacturing. Which means they are not losing any comparative advantage for selling resources as they have placed quotas on the resources which means they are specifically meant for domestic consumption and military build up only. Along with that when an Engineer in the US building high technological weapons makes $50,000 and one in Communist China makes $8,000 a year with the $6 dollar a difference in Communist cold war and centralized manipulation of their currency along with non appreciation of their taken care of the their rural population we see the real value of their military expenditures is actually at around 2.88 trillion as compared to US expenditures of 1.7 trillion. Along with this Communist military expenditures is going primarily to weapons systems and development along with pure economic intelligence training for cold war games where the US expenditures is primarily on actual soldiers food and ammo, along with compared to Communist high technological spending is dwarfed by Communist Chinese under water and deep mountain creation of weapons.
http://www.zacks.com/stock/news/52027/Aerospace+%26amp%3B+Defense+Overview+-+April+2011
http://www.fpif.org/articles/chinas_military_spending_soft_rise_or_hard_threat
As such, we have not seen the proper real evaluation of US military expenditures with the real world new Soviet style threat to world currencies, free markets and Democracies.
2.88 trillion as compared to 1.7 trillion is about 1.18 trillion off. Along with allocation of sources of spending is a major infalac with the Pentagon budget committee in a comparative study of Communist v Democracy.
Along with this does not even include other non shown spending which usually in Communist countries accounts for hundreds of billions of hidden spending that they do not report to their people as there is no opposing political force to check them on it.
Rider I
No comments:
Post a Comment