This is an unprofessional Collection cite. That wishes for Speech and Debate with Regards to the topics collected and Special Libraried. I wish for defense of Fair Use Doctrine, not for profit, educational collection.

"The new order was tailored to a genius who proposed to constrain the contending forces, both domestic and foreign, by manipulating their antagonisms" "As a professor, I tended to think of history as run by impersonal forces. But when you see it in practice, you see the difference personalities make." Therefore, "Whenever peace-concieved as the avoidance of war-has been the primary objective of a power or a group of powers, the international system has been at the mercy of the most ruthless member" Henry Kissinger

The World market crashed. There was complete blame from the worlds most ruthless power on the world's most protective and meditational power. So I responded with: "We must now face the harsh truth that the objectives of communism [The Communist Chinese Party's (CCP) Economic Espionage Units called the MSS] are being steadily advanced because many of us do not recognize the means used to advance them. ... The individual is handicapped by coming face to face with a Conspiracy so monstrous she or he cannot believe it exists. The American mind simply has not come to a realization of the evil which has been introduced into our midst" Therefore, like Dr. John Nash would probable think: This is because of our lost state craft of tracing scientific coding in the intelligence community of the algorithmic code of the Communist espionage agents. As "The Communist [CCP's economic espionage units called the MSS] threat from without must not blind us to the Communist [CCP's economic espionage units called the MSS] threat from within. The latter is reaching into the very heart of America through its espionage agents and a cunning, defiant, and lawless communist party, which is fanatically dedicated to the Marxist cause of world enslavement and destruction of the foundations of our Democracy/Republic." J. Edgar Hoover. Which allows the Communist to shape the future and powers that be. As "Our citizens and our future citizens cannot share properly in shaping the future unless we understand the present, for the raw material of events to come is the knowledge of the present and what we make it"

Lieutenant General Leslie R. Groves

If you have any problem with IP or copyright laws that you feel are in violation of the research clause that allows me to cite them as per clicking on them. Then please email me at
US Copy Right Office Fair Use doctrine. Special Libary community common law, and Speech and Debate Congressional research civilian assistant. All legal defenses to copy right infringement.

Monday, May 23, 2011

How the Democrats and Republicans are Takers and not Providers.

A taker is something that takes away instead of providing for. As such, if we look at the Democrats plan they want to take away from the security of the USA. In which they will then also take from other programs of social safety. In which they will then try and replace them by taken more money out of the pockets the US citizens and then allow the Politicians to do what they want with them, as the root problem still grows and we keep losing jobs and taxes.

A taker is something that takes away instead of providing for. As such, if wee look at the Republican plan we can see huge amounts of the pillars of society being completely torn away. Such entities as medicare for sick or elderly, completely being reduced. The retirement plans that are no longer provided by the private employers from the state being substantial reduced. While then allowing more loss of US surplus through being weak towards the very root problem which has caused the whole thing. This cause is the CCP's SOE's. As such, then they wish to take away and not provide for the US's or it citizens.

What is a real provider in a macro policy?
A provider is somebody that takes care of theirs and makes enough to also provide for others. Also known as boss, huss. This means that boss Politicians are able to provide jobs and good supply side surpluses. However, you could ask either party what their SSS plan is and they would tell you they are taken away from people that is how they are providing to to people. The Democrats think they are providing to people by taking from people to then take the ability of others to be independent. The Republicans think they are providing to people by taken from the weak and impoverished to place back in the hands of the healthy and rich. However, not one part has a strong stance against the root problem of where real providers without some kind of wacko extremist dogmatic tribal loyalty idea that no we are not the takers. BS, you both are weak macro policy supply side surplus creators.

A real provider is like this you children of the thumb suckers and extremist political wacko weirdo's. Yes I provide by taken from my people? LOL.

Let me explain it to you boys and girls what a real provider is. This is for the boot lickers, letting us be destroyed by Soviet Style Economic Warfare tactics.

A provider knows where everything went and why it wen there. Along with that knows it so well that they can see the weakness in legislation and in economic programs so much so as to be able to amend and properly build a Great Society In which the USA has a surplus and each American citizen has a savings instead of being $40,000 in debt to our Politicians purses. Here is what you do. You take a look at your surrounds; Take a literal basket. After you know your economic area like the back of your hand or a Special Library managers mind. Then you sit down and figure out what the problem is. Well, y'all those before licked so much boot that we are in turd debt heaven. So we need to get out of the turdyness. As such, that means I need to know the debt ration. So lets start in history at what point was my area doing well and in a surplus. Then lets do a complete analysis of all legislation that has changed during that time and all things that are different. After that, lets take a good look at things now, via ration elements. After that, lets have some whiskey and a cigar cause nobody in my team licking boots, unless its wify. Then we need to go for a walk as the blood has settled and talk about those boot lickers that came before us. So get some more whiskey and set the cigar down. Then lets figure out the differences and similarities of the time when my area was in surplus and the current turd boot licking heaven. Alright take a look at the first rough riders CEO. Smile and say no boot licking hear Big stick.

Alright enough with the pep talk. So, after we have found the similarties and differnces of the legisation, economic and other myriad of necessary elements to do the supply side surpluse creation algorythm. We then find out how many place in the world our current exporters can export too. Then we figure out the exact number that we need our business to export to get our tax basket proper like. After that go home to the lady, roar do the secret wify husband thing. Wake up, get on motorcycle, go to office. Sit down find out exactly where the business are we need them to kick it in the budd. Make appointments. Get team together with all the necessary elements to say. WE ARE A FREE COUNTRY I AM A POLITICAL LEADER. I CAN'T DO IT FOR YOU AS I DO NOT BELIEVE IN STATE OWNERSHIP. THAT MEANS YOU MY AREA BUSINESS LEADER NEED TO DO THIS SO OUR STATE CAN STAY SECURE. As such, drink whiskey watch them read the proposal. If they say we do our best, place boots on desk and say tell me the plan, lets work on it, my ladies told you to clear your day and I f'ing meant it.

After that work on legislation weak points to create a proper supply side surplus.
Go home, teach the baby how to play alphabet games in investigation around the house of alphabet blocks, tell wify food was good, roar secrety thing, DO it again, until eveyr business in my area has a boot up their yin yang.

That my friend is  a provider. I can't do it for them but I can lead them with my boots.

Rider I

No comments:

Post a Comment