So then that means Baidu and SOSO and Yadoa all are conspiring against me to defame my cite buy lying about it. Then they are not properly following laws of equality or equity in decency to allow equivalent decency tests. For example, if a Communist cite that specifically calls itself militant and has specific documents saying free market and Democracy crisis are necessary and a good thing, then explains that in detail, is allowed through then one would think mine should. Which just tries to defend against Communist Perception. Along with that, if a full book explaining how to destroy free countries is allowed through one would think a website that basically shows how to not destroy a country and help them share their wealth and resources with the world to balance the economy. Along with that if Baidu allows in things that are illegal in Communist China like porn. However, through ideas of equity of liquidity does not allow my cite through because it will harm Communist Chinese SOE's lobbyist the Chinese American's point of views. Then that is not equality. As if they allow porn through which is illegal but then say they can't allow this cite through which is illegal in China. That is a lie. Also if they can allow through songs about killing babies and shooting folks in the head a full blow movies that blow up the white house and show all of our deepest secrets in our movies, like you know us Democracy Republic type folks, we just tell you to f off to your face through open source, cause we believe naturally the folks should know because this is the US's folks country not the elitists.
Therefore, if we see the test as similar indecent things being allowed. In we see that well they are not following that. If the Baidu allows in things that say Taiwan is part of Communist China but does not allow in things that say it is not part of it. Then well not equality of decency. As there are American's and lots of Taiwanese that think that is just as indecent as the opposing idea.
This goes for the idea of allowing in the BPP but not allowing in the NZP. That would not be equality to not allow in the scared cats. Simply stated in the USA if unless you just block the whole idea of Taiwan from your search engine you have no defense to discriminate against other's opposing ideas. That is because you operate a public entity that serves all as per Daniel v Paul. In which then means as per tone of skin, tone of religion or tone of politics one has to not discriminate. It is the same idea with News agencies. If you allow in one side you should have a proper debate with the opposing side. The differences is huge though between a News agency and a search engine. Their operations are very different. A search engine is to search everything. A news agency is based on things that their owner thinks is news. Which means if the one incident is more news worthy than the other then that is ok. However, in a search engine, there is no single style objective point of view in the main operation of the search engine.
So we could see then based on an objective view point of the different operations of the entities that one like a search engine which shows everything in the world except for a few discriminating things, is very different from a news source that shows a very few things that it wishes to highlight. Search engines show trillions of things. In which a news company at best shows maybe a few thousand. Very different in scope. That case is going to be a great one for judicial opinion and precedent. I am sure this will set a milestone in free speech, and probable get my life kicked back to the stone ages via the media. Who cares I love to fight fascist with free speech.
However, in the case of defamation. One could see that if a News cite, was to get on the tv or radio and then say that when folks call in to hear about my cite that they say it does not exist, that they would be defaming my cite and entity as per lying. However, if they properly worded it legally to help folks understand better that the cite just does not carry this opinion then maybe it could be seen. Then again, my cause of action of equality in decency will battle with OTO's power, like a Titan. It is my steeple, and my new weapon against fascism, equality in decency. If you allow such then such should be allowed if it is equivalent. With a proper scope if such allows a vast wide range of such.