This is an unprofessional Collection cite. That wishes for Speech and Debate with Regards to the topics collected and Special Libraried. I wish for defense of Fair Use Doctrine, not for profit, educational collection.

"The new order was tailored to a genius who proposed to constrain the contending forces, both domestic and foreign, by manipulating their antagonisms" "As a professor, I tended to think of history as run by impersonal forces. But when you see it in practice, you see the difference personalities make." Therefore, "Whenever peace-concieved as the avoidance of war-has been the primary objective of a power or a group of powers, the international system has been at the mercy of the most ruthless member" Henry Kissinger

The World market crashed. There was complete blame from the worlds most ruthless power on the world's most protective and meditational power. So I responded with: "We must now face the harsh truth that the objectives of communism [The Communist Chinese Party's (CCP) Economic Espionage Units called the MSS] are being steadily advanced because many of us do not recognize the means used to advance them. ... The individual is handicapped by coming face to face with a Conspiracy so monstrous she or he cannot believe it exists. The American mind simply has not come to a realization of the evil which has been introduced into our midst" Therefore, like Dr. John Nash would probable think: This is because of our lost state craft of tracing scientific coding in the intelligence community of the algorithmic code of the Communist espionage agents. As "The Communist [CCP's economic espionage units called the MSS] threat from without must not blind us to the Communist [CCP's economic espionage units called the MSS] threat from within. The latter is reaching into the very heart of America through its espionage agents and a cunning, defiant, and lawless communist party, which is fanatically dedicated to the Marxist cause of world enslavement and destruction of the foundations of our Democracy/Republic." J. Edgar Hoover. Which allows the Communist to shape the future and powers that be. As "Our citizens and our future citizens cannot share properly in shaping the future unless we understand the present, for the raw material of events to come is the knowledge of the present and what we make it"

Lieutenant General Leslie R. Groves

If you have any problem with IP or copyright laws that you feel are in violation of the research clause that allows me to cite them as per clicking on them. Then please email me at
US Copy Right Office Fair Use doctrine. Special Libary community common law, and Speech and Debate Congressional research civilian assistant. All legal defenses to copy right infringement.

Tuesday, May 31, 2011

Let's see equality in decency.

Since I think folks come and look at my cite.

So then that means Baidu and SOSO and Yadoa all are conspiring against me to defame my cite buy lying about it. Then they are not properly following laws of equality or equity in decency to allow equivalent decency tests. For example, if a Communist cite that specifically calls itself militant and has specific documents saying free market and Democracy crisis are necessary and a good thing, then explains that in detail, is allowed through then one would think mine should. Which just tries to defend against Communist Perception. Along with that, if a full book explaining how to destroy free countries is allowed through one would think a website that basically shows how to not destroy a country and help them share their wealth and resources with the world to balance the economy. Along with that if Baidu allows in things that are illegal in Communist China like porn. However, through ideas of equity of liquidity does not allow my cite through because it will harm Communist Chinese SOE's lobbyist the Chinese American's point of views. Then that is not equality. As if they allow porn through which is illegal but then say they can't allow this cite through which is illegal in China. That is a lie. Also if they can allow through songs about killing babies and shooting folks in the head a full blow movies that blow up the white house and show all of our deepest secrets in our movies, like you know us Democracy Republic type folks, we just tell you to f off to your face through open source, cause we believe naturally the folks should know because this is the US's folks country not the elitists.

Therefore, if we see the test as similar indecent things being allowed. In we see that well they are not following that. If the Baidu allows in things that say Taiwan is part of Communist China but does not allow in things that say it is not part of it. Then well not equality of decency. As there are American's and lots of Taiwanese that think that is just as indecent as the opposing idea.

This goes for the idea of allowing in the BPP but not allowing in the NZP. That would not be equality to not allow in the scared cats. Simply stated in the USA if unless you just block the whole idea of Taiwan from your search engine you have no defense to discriminate against other's opposing ideas. That is because you operate a public entity that serves all as per Daniel v Paul. In which then means as per tone of skin, tone of religion or tone of politics one has to not discriminate. It is the same idea with News agencies. If you allow in one side you should have a proper debate with the opposing side. The differences is huge though between a News agency and a search engine. Their operations are very different. A search engine is to search everything. A news agency is based on things that their owner thinks is news. Which means if the one incident is more news worthy than the other then that is ok. However, in a search engine, there is no single style objective point of view in the main operation of the search engine.

So we could see then based on an objective view point of the different operations of the entities that one like a search engine which shows everything in the world except for a few discriminating things, is very different from a news source that shows a very few things that it wishes to highlight. Search engines show trillions of things. In which a news company at best shows maybe a few thousand. Very different in scope. That case is going to be a great one for judicial opinion and precedent. I am sure this will set a milestone in free speech, and probable get my life kicked back to the stone ages via the media. Who cares I love to fight fascist with free speech.

However, in the case of defamation. One could see that if a News cite, was to get on the tv or radio and then say that when folks call in to hear about my cite that they say it does not exist, that they would be defaming my cite and entity as per lying. However, if they properly worded it legally to help folks understand better that the cite just does not carry this opinion then maybe it could be seen. Then again, my cause of action of equality in decency will battle with OTO's power, like a Titan. It is my steeple, and my new weapon against fascism, equality in decency. If you allow such then such should be allowed if it is equivalent. With a proper scope if such allows a vast wide range of such.

Rider I

No comments:

Post a Comment