Let's say the old school bad arses where right.

In which the Foreign Super Party the Communists. Are trying to congition the idea of defeatisim in our future leaders, Generals and Political clerks. In which they where able to due this through repetition of ideas. Much like in a Communist Party school, you can hear them chant win win win over and over again, to get the idea of domiance stuck in their head. However, lets take the opposite and say a class was created in which the word and idea of defeatism was implemented into a students brain every day a couple times a day. As such, the only way to actually test the old schoolers theory that it was happening to such place an indepth cognition inside of the brains of future leaders to have a response of defeat instead of win, would be to create a test.

See this why I can't stop. If I stop for a weak I will miss over 1,000 clearavolite ideas on this matter.

Thus, then one way to do this after I saw the King's speech was to turn parts of the brain off that check its natural subconsious codeing and function through loud music. However, in the King's speech he had him read. However, in my tests, I have thought that just singing certain songs that implement singing about winning, would lead to mumbling the opposite synapuses response of defeat of some other kind of non aggressive dominate response. As such, if a proper song was created to implement the idea of winning and game thoughts that include areas where thougths should in a team leader that wins, provoke ideas of dominace and providing for winning for one's first response would be replaced by the thoughts of defeatism. I tested this on myself once and forgot until I saw the King's Speech, then I forgot again and it just came back to me.
You find a book or an article that states that losing is a good thing, or refers to negative conotations of winning or being dominat. Then one can also read further with regards to the idea of game theories that implement passive views to then move forward.
At such, one can listen to certain songs. I chose the eye of the tiger, becuase I like my natural coded response of instead of Rival I say Rider, then I am watching y'all, which is cool. However, there are parts in that song that I still sing like my defeatist first time response. Which I caught myself singing in parts where it should be aggressive and advancing cognitions ideas of retreat or even defeat. So who know's I will probable forget the matter. I did not properly further it, However, I think I also did the same thing with regards to leaders in the matter when I was around them and stated certain key words in the background in a normal conversation with somebody else, as I new the leader was listening into the conversation, then a few minutes latter ingaged the leader and saw if I could gain a proper response from the sub conscious codeing I was doing while the leader was listening by talking to somebody else with me in the room, speaking about something else that was really codeing a response I was looking for when I spoke on the matter I wishes to enterain a response in public for. If I am correct the defeatist thing worked and I was able to get a very prominent leader to obtain a humble agreance with that I am correct on a matter that normally they stood very strong on, however, it was just in glance and mumbo jumbo so it was not in front of the papers or on grand stand

We could then take that theory and go very very deep. Much like schools that bread arrogance and pompous circumstance in which every crease is a miserable disgrace. one can also create a class in which every confrontation is something to be domianted by. That is why I was so against the class in the first place. However, the theory was good. I thought the more dominate approach and less obvious foreign codeing would have been an assimilation class.