As such, the basic idea of allowing in a foreign SOE should also be looked at by its political stance. If there is a country that is politically neutral then usual hey will have free markets and it will be an individual and not a whole political party owned cold war weapon. This then means that the in the example of the Communist SOE's anywhere they will go will lead to a huge imbalance in party political economy. For example, in places like Texas, where they have allowed in major Communist players we have started to see a swing in economic power and cognition's from the conservative to the liberal. As the Communist Sovereign Wealth Funds of China have long favored illegally the Democratic party. This then allows the Communist to funnel funds further through channels into a single parties political encampment. On the other hand it allows them to funnel in specific targeted debate warriors that are more prone to CCP single party rule take over of the USA via debt economic macro trade games.
As such, I say again SOE's and Sovereign Wealth Funds are not only a threat to economy but to Democracy.