In a country with a conservative base and a liberal base, we see a nice balance when there is a proper free market. As each sides tribal ideas can be properly dealt with via debate. However, once a foreign SOE's is allowed into a free market then that SOE inputs its political beliefs into the system. This is because of the power structure of an SOE. In the case of Communist SOE's the SOE's is constantly run by a Communist party member and nobody else. That means that for an SOE to come to a free market a Communist Political general with a very powerful economic warfare weapon would have to literally move into the free market. This then means that person gets to chose where they spend their majority of personal and domestic expenditures and earnings. Along with first hand knowledge of the political economy in the country. Which then allows them to properly adjust business cycles and production to properly attack other free enterprises that go against their political beliefs. Which furthermore can then strengthen business or cycles that help their single parties business ideas instead of proper individual whims of competition.
As such, the basic idea of allowing in a foreign SOE should also be looked at by its political stance. If there is a country that is politically neutral then usual hey will have free markets and it will be an individual and not a whole political party owned cold war weapon. This then means that the in the example of the Communist SOE's anywhere they will go will lead to a huge imbalance in party political economy. For example, in places like Texas, where they have allowed in major Communist players we have started to see a swing in economic power and cognition's from the conservative to the liberal. As the Communist Sovereign Wealth Funds of China have long favored illegally the Democratic party. This then allows the Communist to funnel funds further through channels into a single parties political encampment. On the other hand it allows them to funnel in specific targeted debate warriors that are more prone to CCP single party rule take over of the USA via debt economic macro trade games.
As such, I say again SOE's and Sovereign Wealth Funds are not only a threat to economy but to Democracy.
Rider i
Don Cayoty
As such, the basic idea of allowing in a foreign SOE should also be looked at by its political stance. If there is a country that is politically neutral then usual hey will have free markets and it will be an individual and not a whole political party owned cold war weapon. This then means that the in the example of the Communist SOE's anywhere they will go will lead to a huge imbalance in party political economy. For example, in places like Texas, where they have allowed in major Communist players we have started to see a swing in economic power and cognition's from the conservative to the liberal. As the Communist Sovereign Wealth Funds of China have long favored illegally the Democratic party. This then allows the Communist to funnel funds further through channels into a single parties political encampment. On the other hand it allows them to funnel in specific targeted debate warriors that are more prone to CCP single party rule take over of the USA via debt economic macro trade games.
As such, I say again SOE's and Sovereign Wealth Funds are not only a threat to economy but to Democracy.
Rider i
Don Cayoty
No comments:
Post a Comment