A Functional SOE is something that is based on a non necessary element of industrial goods. This for example is something like security. We could all pay for security. However, over time it was found that a necessary element of non tribal concern was necessary for a stable society as a whole. Then we get the functional SOE of public school. This again was found to be necessary for all people to have. Along with minor other SOE's like welfare institutions.
The basic idea is the differences between the use of the SOE for the creation of a soverign wealth fund and the creation of the SOE for a functional purpose. For example, lets take baker business. This business is based on the idea that someone needs someone to bake for them. As such, the bakery could be owned by the State much like what we are seeing in Venezuela. Then this entity is controlled by the powers that be of the political tribe in rule. This means that the prices are set and controlled and therefore, may not represent the actual availablit of other markets to obtain them at such a price. Therefore, this centralizes the wealth around this baker. Then if the baker is not selling the product at a non profit their is a wealth creation. This wealth creation is then stored by the elitiest for their whims. This then is a full blown communist SOE.
Some might say well why do not we just create functional soe's for everything. The idea is then you get into teh basic soul cognition of wanting to own ones own works and labors someday. If such was done, the functional SOE's in every industry would drive away possibility of people to own their own business. Which then would just mean that instead of living ones dreams of their own business there would be less dreams and more enslavement.
As the US's values are based around those who get to play and live their dreams. I would seem that anything other than minimal functional SOE's would destroy the basic values of the culture. Then you say, but what if everyone can't get something from the industry like a Bentley or a thirty dollar steak. Then this is called scarcity for competitive gain.
This scarcity that is created means that person wants to obtain something nicer. As such they will compete more for that product. This then means, that they will have to advance things and make things better for all. This is called innovation. On the other hand you have competitive gain. The idea is that if someone is just given a job and becomes complacent with no competition, raises, or other types of perks they might lose their ability to create something new and advantageous for the market place. Then we find that human beings become much like what we saw in the Soviet Union, very dull and far behind on natural free market competitive ideas and cultural moves.
As such, the main reason why i stand against SOE's and Sovering Wealth funds is primarily the idea that it takes away from the spread of the market place through competitive gain to find more market shares to create a competition for ones soul ownership of their own soul instead of a ownership by an elitiest.
Rider I
More or less I do not enslavement. To me the idea of individual freedom and ownership of ones goals to find where their soul belongs is the utmost thing to obtain.
The basic idea is the differences between the use of the SOE for the creation of a soverign wealth fund and the creation of the SOE for a functional purpose. For example, lets take baker business. This business is based on the idea that someone needs someone to bake for them. As such, the bakery could be owned by the State much like what we are seeing in Venezuela. Then this entity is controlled by the powers that be of the political tribe in rule. This means that the prices are set and controlled and therefore, may not represent the actual availablit of other markets to obtain them at such a price. Therefore, this centralizes the wealth around this baker. Then if the baker is not selling the product at a non profit their is a wealth creation. This wealth creation is then stored by the elitiest for their whims. This then is a full blown communist SOE.
Some might say well why do not we just create functional soe's for everything. The idea is then you get into teh basic soul cognition of wanting to own ones own works and labors someday. If such was done, the functional SOE's in every industry would drive away possibility of people to own their own business. Which then would just mean that instead of living ones dreams of their own business there would be less dreams and more enslavement.
As the US's values are based around those who get to play and live their dreams. I would seem that anything other than minimal functional SOE's would destroy the basic values of the culture. Then you say, but what if everyone can't get something from the industry like a Bentley or a thirty dollar steak. Then this is called scarcity for competitive gain.
This scarcity that is created means that person wants to obtain something nicer. As such they will compete more for that product. This then means, that they will have to advance things and make things better for all. This is called innovation. On the other hand you have competitive gain. The idea is that if someone is just given a job and becomes complacent with no competition, raises, or other types of perks they might lose their ability to create something new and advantageous for the market place. Then we find that human beings become much like what we saw in the Soviet Union, very dull and far behind on natural free market competitive ideas and cultural moves.
As such, the main reason why i stand against SOE's and Sovering Wealth funds is primarily the idea that it takes away from the spread of the market place through competitive gain to find more market shares to create a competition for ones soul ownership of their own soul instead of a ownership by an elitiest.
Rider I
More or less I do not enslavement. To me the idea of individual freedom and ownership of ones goals to find where their soul belongs is the utmost thing to obtain.
No comments:
Post a Comment