This idea is then crushed when one looks at Paul Brinkley's plan to implement over 200 SOE's in Iraq to make Iraq Communist Iraq. As not even Communist China has a full blown 200 SOE's anymore. It is one thing to a few SOE's for such things as medical, or police and school. However, to get full blown SOE's in which do not allow the people to feel like their own their labors, and feel again like they are working underneath a single party dictatorial ship is completely against the reason why American young men and women gave their lives to free Iraq.
Freedom is not the allowance of SOE's take away the basic rights of life which is the right to own ones labors. This is well documented in the US. As such, How Paul Brinkley could think that the right thing to do in a place where people just got out of being forced into SOE's for the Dictator now wish to be forced into SOE's for the political party in control is unbelievable. Along these lines it makes the other tribes not in power feel like they are being unfairly competed against in the Iraq economic market place because they do not hold power. This then will cause a major civil war in Iraq due to political unrest and the abuse of power with the SOE's and the sovereign wealth funds that create them. In a Democracy we have seen that SOE's become a focal part for areas of countries that have SOE's. As we have seen in Venezuela Paul Brinkley is creating an atmosphere for another Communist Dictator in which can easily again control the wealth of the people and force them to have to compete with political tribes for economic market shares instead of with each other. Which again goes against the bases of Democracy and a free market.
Paul Brinkley should be fired and asked why he would wish to create a Communist Iraq. When it would be much more fruitful to help equalize ownership of market shares through the different people through funds and loans and other areas. So as to help the Iraqi people feel free instead of under the power of something other than their own will.
Fire him. The idea that US went to four wars to stop SOE's and Sovereign Wealth funds from destroying Democracy and then helping set up single party rulers based on those massive SOE's and Sovereign Wealth funds if you know anything with regards to the roots of the four wars. Seems to me absurd that the government would allow in a peace keeping mission someone who wishes to piss on the graves of our soldiers by re setting up the very root thing that US citizens have fought against since the begging of this great country. SOE's and Sovereign Wealth funds, did anyone not tell Paul about mm the war against the King's SOE and Sovereign Wealth funds, or The Socialist Germans SOE's and Sovereign Wealth funds which helped them get their machines and military power to conquest for more, or the Soviets and the Communist Chinese SOE's and Sovereign Wealth funds that where used to invade North Korea and then Vietnam. What this guy working closely with our country for. 200 SOE's are f'ing kidding me.
So far here is what I have read which is the same mentality of every kign dictator and communist political member. The people do not know what they are doing they need a king to show them how to do it and then manage it for them. US citizens believe in freedom and their own ownership of labors. What do they not have the Internet or they can't read? I know they have both and I know there are citizens in Iraq that are very interested in setting up their own business to provide Internet services, along with other telecommunications.