This is an unprofessional Collection cite. That wishes for Speech and Debate with Regards to the topics collected and Special Libraried. I wish for defense of Fair Use Doctrine, not for profit, educational collection.

"The new order was tailored to a genius who proposed to constrain the contending forces, both domestic and foreign, by manipulating their antagonisms" "As a professor, I tended to think of history as run by impersonal forces. But when you see it in practice, you see the difference personalities make." Therefore, "Whenever peace-concieved as the avoidance of war-has been the primary objective of a power or a group of powers, the international system has been at the mercy of the most ruthless member" Henry Kissinger

The World market crashed. There was complete blame from the worlds most ruthless power on the world's most protective and meditational power. So I responded with: "We must now face the harsh truth that the objectives of communism [The Communist Chinese Party's (CCP) Economic Espionage Units called the MSS] are being steadily advanced because many of us do not recognize the means used to advance them. ... The individual is handicapped by coming face to face with a Conspiracy so monstrous she or he cannot believe it exists. The American mind simply has not come to a realization of the evil which has been introduced into our midst" Therefore, like Dr. John Nash would probable think: This is because of our lost state craft of tracing scientific coding in the intelligence community of the algorithmic code of the Communist espionage agents. As "The Communist [CCP's economic espionage units called the MSS] threat from without must not blind us to the Communist [CCP's economic espionage units called the MSS] threat from within. The latter is reaching into the very heart of America through its espionage agents and a cunning, defiant, and lawless communist party, which is fanatically dedicated to the Marxist cause of world enslavement and destruction of the foundations of our Democracy/Republic." J. Edgar Hoover. Which allows the Communist to shape the future and powers that be. As "Our citizens and our future citizens cannot share properly in shaping the future unless we understand the present, for the raw material of events to come is the knowledge of the present and what we make it"

Lieutenant General Leslie R. Groves

If you have any problem with IP or copyright laws that you feel are in violation of the research clause that allows me to cite them as per clicking on them. Then please email me at
US Copy Right Office Fair Use doctrine. Special Libary community common law, and Speech and Debate Congressional research civilian assistant. All legal defenses to copy right infringement.

Sunday, May 8, 2011

Rousse on Single Party power no being allowed to transition to another party.

" a matter of right, any pact of subjection, any agreement that on man or group of men has a right to command others, is but an acceptance of slavery and its without moral justification; and he was convinced that, as a matter of fact, the power of any particular group within the community is not absolute but rests at least to some extent upon the consent of others groups, and is, therefore, relative, contingent, and transitory"

This is a theory of Rosseu's Social Contract From the Hafner Library of Classics 1947, pgs xxii-xxiii.

The idea is then applied to the fact of nature in which one party does not hold supreme in any country. Even in such a theorist as one who believed that the whole as a whole governed based on the whole, instead of the whole being able to govern based on the individual. I have read Rousseau many times. As it somewhat differs from my opinions which get down to the metaphysics of individuality, literally. Which today we can prove its existence of old theories. However, I like re reading things and going over them as I grow older.

Therefore, I thought I would post this.

The idea that I get from so many scholars and Illumanitus that where banned from Monarchies and dictatorial  single party rules. Is the idea that if one party holds supreme and may never be moved out of rule. Then it is itself an enslavement and not a sovereign government. As it is more like a monarchy and feudalistic single party rule than a rule of the people. As people have the right to transition power from one ruler to another. Transitory, to me means transitional, meaning one thing can't rule forever, as that is not for the people.

Sovereignty does not reside in any single group. But all groups acting together through debate, and forensics and checks and balances. 

No comments:

Post a Comment